<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Semantic Puzzle&#187; gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.semantic-web.at/tag/gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.semantic-web.at</link>
	<description>Open World Assumptions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;75 Bleeding Edge Search Engines&#8221; &#8230; according to CMS Wire</title>
		<link>http://blog.semantic-web.at/2008/08/29/75-bleeding-edge-search-engines-according-to-cms-wire/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.semantic-web.at/2008/08/29/75-bleeding-edge-search-engines-according-to-cms-wire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tassilo Pellegrini</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies & Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.semantic-web.at/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article on CMS Wire from July 10, 2008 is a nice read for all search engine afficionados. It lists 75 web search engines and categorizes them according to their technology and application domain. In the category &#8220;Semantic and Natural &#8230; <a href="http://blog.semantic-web.at/2008/08/29/75-bleeding-edge-search-engines-according-to-cms-wire/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.semantic-web.at/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dewey_screenschot5.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-250" title="dewey_screenschot5" src="http://blog.semantic-web.at/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dewey_screenschot5-300x184.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="184" /></a>This <a href="http://www.cmswire.com/cms/search/-75-bleedingedge-search-engines-to-beat-google-002861.php">article on CMS Wire</a> from July 10, 2008 is a nice read for all search engine afficionados. It lists 75 web search engines and categorizes them according to their technology and application domain. In the category &#8220;Semantic and Natural Language Search Engines&#8221; you will find usual suspects like <a href="http://powerset.com/">Powerset</a>, <a href="http://hakia.com/">Hakia</a>, <a href="http://swoogle.umbc.edu/">Swoogle</a>, <a href="http://www.semanticwebsearch.com/query/">Intellidimension</a>, <a href="http://iws.seu.edu.cn/services/falcons/objectsearch/index.jsp">Falcon</a>, <a href="http://www.yr-bcn.es/demos/microsearch/">Yahoo! Microsearch</a>, <a href="http://swse.deri.org/faq.html">SWSE</a> and <a href="http://watson.kmi.open.ac.uk/WatsonWUI/">Watson</a>. Sadly not in the list is <a href="http://mqlx.com/%7Edavid/parallax/">Freebase Parallax</a>, but I doubt they have been online by then.</p>
<p>Personally I like the category &#8220;Bizarre / Strange Search Engines&#8221; most. Ever used <a href="http://msdewey.com/">Ms. Dewey</a>, a <img src="file:///C:/DOKUME~1/PELLEG~1/LOKALE~1/Temp/moz-screenshot-2.jpg" alt="" />Microsoft search engine &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>that sings to you, insults you and lives under a highway flyover in a futuristic cityscape?</p></blockquote>
<p>At first sight a really good laugh. Discussing it from a gender perspective would definitely be worth another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.semantic-web.at/2008/08/29/75-bleeding-edge-search-engines-according-to-cms-wire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

