Jana Herwig

The Future, Quantum Encryption, Privacy on the Social Semantic Web

Just two memos: There is a talk tonight with Thomas Länger from the Viennese quantum encryption project (BBC article about the project), co-organized by quintessenz (an organisation devoted to civil rights in the information age) and Transforming Freedom (who are dedicated to documenting the discourse of the battle zones of digital culture; I volunteer for them). ORF wrote a German article about it, with information about the venue and start time. The key issue quintessenz want to raise with this talk is: Who is going to benefit? Will “unbrekable” quantum encryption become available to citizens, too? Quantum encryption cartridges for your PC, anyone?

Secondly: I published an “inaugural interview” Marion Fugléwicz-Bren did with two of my colleagues, Matthias Samwald and Thomas Schandl (not so inaugural for the former, as he already joined SWC in January). I’d like to extract this quote by W3C member Samwald regarding privacy on the (corporation owned) social web and the future (user-managed) social semantic web:

I also think that Semantic Web technologies will receive a lot of media attention when the first big, public breach in security / privacy happens in one of the websites that currently dominate the whole world wide web. At the moment, we all are uploading most of our private and business lives to web sites such as Google, Facebook, Flickr and others. It is just a matter of time until a big scandal happens, be it the companies themselves that misuse the vast amounts of data they have, or be it a government agency in an overzealous effort of crime prevention.

When this will happen, people will re-evaluate the trend towards massive centralisation on the web, and will search for opportunities to make the same feeling of being ‘in the network’ happen in a distributed environment, without selling ones soul to a multinational corporation. Then we will find that such an opportunity already exists — the Semantic Web.

Read the whole interview here.

Jana Herwig

Google I/O: Videos, Slides and a brief summary of the OpenSocial Talk

OpenSocial ContainersOn May 28 & 29 2008, Google I/O, the developer gathering around Google’s applications and APIs, took place in San Francisco. Most of the slides and videos of the session have now been posted on their website, and it’s quite a stack of interesting thoughts, instructions and proposals to dig through, published in six different categories: AJAX & JavaScript, APIs & Tools, Maps & Geo, Mobile, Social and Tech Talk. I highly recommend to have a look at the menu yourself – for the moment, I am only going to highlight one talk about OpenSocial as a standard for the Social Web by Chris Schalk, Kevin Marks and Patrick Chanezon.

Patrick opened the talk, picking up on a definition of social objects as proposed by Jyri Engeström, founder of Jaiku (acquired by Google in October 2007). A social object is an object that is socialized, e.g. a photo on Flickr. These are the five questions that one needs to tackle, according to Jyri:

1. What is your object?
- For instance a photo on Flickr, a slide on slideshar.

2. What are your verbs?
- E.g a photo on Flickr is uploaded and tagged, on eBay, an object is sold and bought; these verbs must have a a prominent position in the design of the user-interface).

3. How can people share the objects?
- Each object must have a unique URL; Flickr was only successful once it introduced URLs for each photo.

4. What is the gift in the invitation?
- Patrick always spams messages such as “Please join platform XYZ and help me save time filling in my addressbook”, because there is no gift in the invitation for the recipient.

5. Are you charging the publishers or the spectators?
- this means: What is your businessmodel?

Here is Jyri’s original presentation that Patrick draws on.

Patrick then raised the question: How do we socialize objects online without having to create yet another social network? The OpenSocial Foundation, not surprisingly, is his answer to this challenge, whose claim is to “Keep the specification open.” The image above shows which platforms have already joined the OpenSocial Foundation – German language social network StudiVZ is also part of the crowd.

Zemanta Pixie
Marion Fuglewicz-Bren

Why transcend our biology? Ray Kurzweil’s questionable future forecast

“By 2029 we’ll have intelligent nanobots go into our brains… to make us smarter”, said Ray Kurzweil. The inventor and futurist is a pioneer in the fields of artificial intelligence, futurism and more. The engineer believes machines and humans will eventually merge through devices implanted in the body to boost intelligence and health. (BBC-News).

Mr. Kurzweil is one of 18 influential thinkers chosen to identify the great technological challenges facing humanity in the 21st century by the US National Academy of Engineering. The experts include Google founder Larry Page and genome pioneer Dr. Craig Venter.

“I have consistently predicted that by 2029 we will be able to create machines that pass the Turing test”, says Kurzweil. “The result will be a formidable combination, uniting the subtlety and suppleness of human intelligence with the ways in which machines are already superior – for example, in their ability to download knowledge at electronic speeds… But this will not be an alien invasion of intelligent machines: rather, we will merge with the tools we are creating.”

Friends, Romans, Brothers and Sisters of the Free Spirit, are you sure, this is what we really want? Is this the quality of life we’re aiming at?

In 1990, when people around the globe were hyped by Virtual Reality and the idea of doing anything to anyone and pursuing all kinds of dreams to come true in cyberspace. I read and wrote lots of articles on this sexy topic, in all kinds of media, and – believe me, it was not (only) a yellow press topic. As an apologist of words, language and communications I was fascinated by the matter and all imaginable new future opportunities of How Real is Real? and all kinds of virtual realities.

And the fascination about reality to me seemingly couldn’t exist amongst animate beings – without communication. Every communication has a content and relationship aspect such that the latter classifies the former and is therefore a metacommunication. Thus “Mister Communication” Paul Watzlawick. This means that all communication includes, apart from the plain meaning of words, more information – information on how the talker wants to be understood and how he himself sees his relation to the receiver of information.

Wow. Hi, semantics. Let’s return to Mister Kurzweil. He names the (wish of) “merging with the tools we are creating”. The historically old concept of a homunculus (Latin for “little man”; the diminutive of homo, “man”) is often used to illustrate the functioning of a system. In the scientific sense of an unknowable prime actor, it can be viewed as an entity or agent. The homunculus-motive has often been revisited within (not only classic) literature particularly to demonstrate the ambivalence of modern techniques.

There is an independent, feature-length documentary being made about Ray Kurzweil, his life, and his ideas called Transcendent Man. Filmmakers Barry and Felicia Ptolemy follow the inventor and futurist around the globe documenting his world-wide speaking tour. Scheduled for release in 2009[6], Transcendent Man, documents Ray’s quest to reveal mankind’s ultimate destiny and explores many of the ideas found in his New York Times bestselling book, The Singularity is Near, including his concept of exponential growth, radical life expansion, and how we will transcend our biology.

So, what the hell is all this transcending about? What is this universal social-web-fever all about? Is it about communication? Is it about transcending one’s own insufficiency? Is it about desire? Still fascinated and curious what’s going to happen:
Marion.